Account

Abstract not indexed. Read at source

Topics

Endometriosis > Pathophysiology > Etiology TheoriesEndometriosis > Pathophysiology > Retrograde Menstruation DebateEthics/Philosophy > Scientific Debate > Disease Causation
Redwine Sampson retrograde menstruation theory, endometriosis pathogenesis Sampson theory critique, origin of endometriosis implantation versus embryonic rest, Mullerian rest theory endometriosis, Redwine endometriosis etiology challenge, retrograde menstruation endometriosis causation debate, endometriosis pathophysiology alternative theories, Sampson transplantation theory critique, embryonic origin of endometriosis, endometriosis histogenesis debate
PMID 12372441 12372441 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03329-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03329-0

Cite this article

Redwine, D. B. (2002). Was Sampson wrong?. *Fertility and Sterility*, *78*(4), 686-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03329-0

Related articles

Recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2026 Fertility and Sterility

Current strategies for the assessment and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss are discussed. This replaces the previous document, titled, "Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a com...