Account

Abstract not indexed. Read at publisher

Topics

Surgery > Tubal Surgery > Microsurgical ReconstructionInfertility > Tubal Factor > Surgical vs ART ComparisonSurgery > Reproductive Surgery > Fallopian Tube Repair
Gomel reconstructive tubal microsurgery versus IVF, tubal microsurgery compared to assisted reproductive technology, fallopian tube reconstruction surgical technique outcomes, tubal reanastomosis microsurgery fertility outcomes, surgical alternatives to IVF tubal factor infertility, Gomel tubal surgery ART comparison fertility sterility, tubal ligation reversal microsurgical technique, reconstructive reproductive surgery versus in vitro fertilization, fallopian tube repair microsurgery fertility restoration, tubal factor infertility surgical versus ART treatment
PMID 26773194 26773194 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Cite this article

Gomel, V. (2016). Reconstructive tubal microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology. *Fertility and sterility*, *105*(4), 887-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.040

Related articles

Recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2026 Fertility and Sterility

Current strategies for the assessment and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss are discussed. This replaces the previous document, titled, "Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a com...