Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss
To determine whether in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening (IVF/PGS) is cost effective compared with expectant management in achieving live birth for patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).
Design
Decision analytic model comparing costs and clinical outcomes.
Setting
Academic recurrent pregnancy loss programs.
PATIENT(S): Women with unexplained RPL.
INTERVENTION(S): IVF/PGS with 24-chromosome screening and expectant management.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Cost per live birth.
RESULT(S): The IVF/PGS strategy had a live-birth rate of 53% and a clinical miscarriage rate of 7%. Expectant management had a live-birth rate of 67% and clinical miscarriage rate of 24%. The IVF/PGS strategy was 100-fold more expensive, costing $45,300 per live birth compared with $418 per live birth with expectant management.
CONCLUSION(S): In this model, IVF/PGS was not a cost-effective strategy for increasing live birth. Furthermore, the live-birth rate with IVF/PGS needs to be 91% to be cost effective compared with expectant management.
preimplantation genetic screening recurrent pregnancy loss cost-effectiveness, IVF PGS versus expectant management recurrent miscarriage, unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss treatment comparison live birth, cost per live birth IVF PGS expectant management RPL, 24 chromosome screening recurrent pregnancy loss outcomes, decision analytic model recurrent miscarriage IVF cost, expectant management live birth rate recurrent pregnancy loss, Lathi recurrent pregnancy loss preimplantation genetic screening, IVF cost-effectiveness unexplained RPL clinical miscarriage rate, natural conception versus IVF recurrent pregnancy loss
PMID 25772770 25772770 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012
Cite this article
Murugappan, G., Ohno, M. S., & Lathi, R. B. (2015). Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. *Fertility and sterility*, *103*(5), 1215-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012
Murugappan G, Ohno MS, Lathi RB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1215-1220. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012
Murugappan, Gayathree, et al. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss." *Fertility and sterility*, vol. 103, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1215-1220.
Keywords
Abortion, Habitual/diagnosis/economics/genetics/prevention & Control, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Fertilization in Vitro/adverse Effects/economics, Genetic Testing/economics, Health Care Costs, Humans, Live Birth, Models, Economic, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Preimplantation Diagnosis/economics/methods, Treatment Outcome, Cost Effectiveness, In vitro Fertilization, Preimplantation Genetic Screening, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Farquhar CM2005Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
PURPOSE OF Review: Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome are typically anovulatory and require ovulation induction. Ovarian wedge resection was the first treatment for anovulation but was eventually ...
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine2026Fertility and Sterility
Current strategies for the assessment and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss are discussed. This replaces the previous document, titled, "Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a com...
IMPORTANCE: Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) aims to restore fertility by diagnosing and treating the underlying causes of infertility. RRM is frequently promoted as an alternative to assisted ...
Objective: To examine birth outcomes between children conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and sibling births from unassisted conceptions.
Design: Retrospect...
IVF OutcomesBirth Weight and Gestational AgeSibling Studies